The Balassa-Samuelson Effect in Central and Eastern Europe: Myth or Reality?

By Balázs Égert, I. Drine, K. Lommatzsch, Christophe Rault. 2003

276 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdd106c923647b5e58eefc359d4039123443a228

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Equilibrium Exchange Rates in Transition Economies: Taking Stock of the Issues (2006, unknown): “…series for the same country can exhibit differences depending on whether it is drawn from national statistics, from the IMF or from OECD databases (Égert et al., 2003).60 Another problem that needs addressing in this context is that the weights used to calculate effective exchange rates are…”
The Balassa–Samuelson Effect in Central Europe: A Disaggregated Analysis (2004, unknown): “The estimates in this paper are closer to several recent studies (including Aratibel et al (2002); Cipriani (2001); Egert et al. (2002), and pooled as well as some individual country estimates in Egert (2002a and 2002b)) that also found, using a different framework, little support for the…”
Real Convergence, Price Level Convergence and Inflation Differentials in Europe (2007, unknown): “…estimate linking the relative price of market non-tradables and productivity ( β ), and applies it to the accounting framework in the following way (see e.g. Égert et al. 2003): )prod(α)(1p NTTS-B prod∆−∆−=∆ β (5) Note that the hybrid approach collapses to the accounting framework if 1=β .”
The J-curve in the emerging economies of Eastern Europe (2009, background): “…new EU members, namely, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, in the 1 Following studies investigate the reasons for such appreciation: Kemme and Teng, 2000; Dibooglu and Kutan, 2001; Égert, 2002; Égert et al., 2002; Bulı́ř and Šmı́dková, 2005; De Broeck and Sløk, 2005.”
Robustness of the multi‐objective MOORA method with a test for the facilities sector (2009, background): “, comparable to so many other nominal scales in multi-objective analysis (for instance, mentioned by Brauers 2004: 97–99). A debate between Frisch (1933) and Tinbergen (1930) ensued as whether or not Tinbergen had estimated structural form representations robust to changes in policy regimes or reduc”