Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students.

By Victoria L. Banyard, M. Moynihan. 2011

264 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Gender Studies, Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdcda00a5fd094017ddb8426389c987e53c72e4c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Gender Studies

1. Amy L. Brown
2. Victoria L. Banyard
3. M. Moynihan
4. Alison C. Cares
5. S. Ramsay
6. Michelle Barker
7. Sara Branch

In Health

1. Amy L. Brown
2. Victoria L. Banyard
3. M. Moynihan
4. Alison C. Cares
5. S. Ramsay
6. Michelle Barker
7. Sara Branch

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Amy L. Brown
2. Victoria L. Banyard
3. M. Moynihan
4. Alison C. Cares
5. R. Warner

Citations in the corpus

• How do we know if it works? Measuring outcomes in bystander-focused abuse prevention on campuses (2014, background): “Theoretical work by McMahon and Banyard (2012) and empirical work by Banyard and Moynihan (2011) suggested that meaningful subtypes of bystander behavior existed in four to five subscales.”
• College Students as Helpful Bystanders Against Sexual Violence (2014, methodology): “Banyard and Moynihan (2011) observed an unexpected positive relationship between peer norms supporting sexual coercion and bystander behavior; we contend that this relationship could be explained by assuming that people with coercive peers have more opportunities to intervene.”