Interrater Agreement Measures: Comments on Kappan, Cohen's Kappa, Scott's π, and Aickin's α

By L. Hsu, R. Field. 2003

149 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Statistics and Probability

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdb5bd377caac22199c60614e14e1c7b957a971a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Statistics and Probability

1. Matthijs J. Warrens

Citations in the corpus

• Some Paradoxical Results for the Quadratically Weighted Kappa (2012, background): “…between raters are the descriptive statistics Cohen’s (1960) unweighted kappa for ratings on a nominal scale (Brennan & Prediger, 1981; Zwick, 1988; Hsu & Field, 2003; Vanbelle & Albert, 2009a; Warrens 2008a, 2008b, 2010a, 2010b, 2010c), denoted by κ , and Cohen’s (1968) weighted kappa for…”
• Cohen's kappa is a weighted average (2011, unknown): “is the proportion of chance–expected agreement if it is assumed that the frequency distribution underlying the two nominal variables is the same for both variables [34,11,28].”