Do performance avoidance goals moderate the effect of different types of stereotype threat on women’s math performance?

By Katherine M Finnigan, Katherine S. Corker. 2016

55 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Stereotype threat is considered to be a robust effect that explains persistent gender gaps in math performance and scientific career trajectories. Some evidence suggests stereotype threat effects are buffered by adoption of performance avoidance goals (Chalabaev, Major, Sarrazin, & Cury, 2012). With 590 American female participants, we closely replicated Chalabaev et al. (2012). Results showed no significant main or interaction effects for stereotype threat or performance avoidance goals, despite multiple controls. We conclude that effects of stereotype threat might be smaller than typically reported and find limited evidence for moderation by avoidance achievement goals. Accordingly, stereotype threat might not be a major part of the explanation for the gender gap in math performance, consistent with recent meta-analyses (Flore & Wicherts, 2015).

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cdad73b3dd7f929b7fa60a146b22046ccadbd6d3

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

  1. Silvana Weber
  2. Steve Stewart-Williams
  3. Markus Appel
  4. L. Halsey

In Safety Research

  1. Silvana Weber
  2. Steve Stewart-Williams
  3. Markus Appel
  4. L. Halsey

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Silvana Weber
  2. Steve Stewart-Williams
  3. Markus Appel
  4. L. Halsey

Citations in the corpus