Classification vs regression in overparameterized regimes: Does the loss function matter?

By Vidya Muthukumar, Adhyyan Narang, Vignesh Subramanian, Mikhail Belkin, Daniel J. Hsu, Anant Sahai. 2020

172 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We compare classification and regression tasks in the overparameterized linear model with Gaussian features. On the one hand, we show that with sufficient overparameterization all training points are support vectors: solutions obtained by least-squares minimum-norm interpolation, typically used for regression, are identical to those produced by the hard-margin support vector machine (SVM) that minimizes the hinge loss, typically used for training classifiers. On the other hand, we show that there exist regimes where these solutions are near-optimal when evaluated by the 0-1 test loss function, but do not generalize if evaluated by the square loss function, i.e. they achieve the null risk. Our results demonstrate the very different roles and properties of loss functions used at the training phase (optimization) and the testing phase (generalization).

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Statistics and Probability

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Yoshua Bengio
  2. Stefano Soatto
  3. Alessandro Achille
  4. Robert Tibshirani
  5. Avinash Ravichandran
  6. Trevor J. Hastie
  7. Simon Lacoste-Julien
  8. Aditya Golatkar

In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

  1. Luc Van Gool
  2. Dacheng Tao
  3. Andrew Zisserman
  4. Ming-Hsuan Yang
  5. Jitendra Malik
  6. Andrea Vedaldi
  7. Trevor Darrell
  8. Xiaogang Wang

In Statistics and Probability

  1. Robert Tibshirani
  2. Trevor J. Hastie
  3. Jonathan E. Taylor
  4. Andrea Montanari
  5. Stefan Wager
  6. Saharon Rosset
  7. Sara A. van de Geer
  8. Cun-Hui Zhang

Citations in the corpus