Fueling the Fire: Violent Metaphors, Trait Aggression, and Support for Political Violence

By Nathan P. Kalmoe. 2014

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd82bf93ff98b323e6d29faf927194688ef1c0a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Christian Burgers
2. Gerard Steen
3. Barbara Vis
4. Britta C. Brugman

In Social Psychology

1. Christian Burgers
2. Elly A. Konijn
3. Gerard Steen
4. Barbara Vis
5. Britta C. Brugman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Christian Burgers
2. Elly A. Konijn
3. Gerard Steen
4. Barbara Vis
5. Mohamed Yacine Haddoud
6. W. Nowiński

Citations in the corpus

• Metaphorical framing in political discourse through words vs. concepts: a meta-analysis (2019, background): “An example is a study by Kalmoe (2014), who analyzed the effects of using fighting words (e.g., “battle”, “fight”, “attack”) to present politics as war (vs. a non-metaphorical description) on support for political violence.”
• Figurative framing: Shaping public discourse through metaphor, hyperbole, and irony (2016, background): “, “I promise to work for all the people”) for individuals high in trait aggressiveness (Kalmoe, 2014).”