What Do Farmers Want From Agri‐Environmental Scheme Design? A Choice Experiment Approach
By M. Espinosa‐Goded, J. Barreiro‐Hurlé, Eric Ruto. 2010
344 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd6e242d2bd11a23206fe4f1bd76e697fb10f32a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- G. Garrod
- R. Préget
- Sophie Thoyer
- L. Kuhfuss
- J. A. Gómez‐Limón
- M. Rodríguez-Entrena
- Anastasio J. Villanueva
- Manuel Arriaza
In General Decision Sciences
Citations in the corpus
- Nudging farmers to enrol land into agri-environmental schemes: the role of a collective bonus (2016, methodology): “The choice modelling method has been used in several recent studies to better understand the impact of various contract designs on adoption rates (for example, Espinosa-Goded et al., 2010; Christensen et al., 2011; Broch and Vedel 2011; Broch et al., 2013).”
- Evaluating farmers’ likely participation in a payment programme for water quality protection in the UK uplands (2013, background): “The CL model postulates an indirect utility function (Unj), which represents the satisfaction that a farmer (n) associates with one of the particular programmes offered (j) as the summation of separate components of utility delivered by each of K attributes xkj contained within that programme, toget”
- The design of agri-environmental schemes: Farmers’ preferences in southern Spain (2015, background): “This is in line with the evidence found in the literature that highlights strong farmer preferences toward flexibility concerning farming requisites included in AES (Espinosa-Goded et al., 2010; Christensen et al., 2011).”
- What drives farmers’ participation in EU agri-environmental schemes?: Results from a qualitative meta-analysis (2015, background): “The level of payment made to the farmer depends on the activities undertaken and the agricultural capacity of the land and is calculated by taking into account income forgone and the additional costs associated with the requirements of the scheme (Espinosa-Goded et al., 2010).”