Maximal deformation of an impacting drop
By Hors Equilibre, Joliot Curie. 2004
364 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd6b4da68b7bed9c15c530ce1c8d93ecb8df0a6e
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- C. Josserand
- N. D. Patil
- Jae Bong Lee
- G. Lagubeau
- Ilker S. Bayer
- N. Laan
- D. Bonn
- Constantine M. Megaridis
Citations in the corpus
- Maximum Diameter of Impacting Liquid Droplets (2014, methodology): “For themomentum-conservation (MC)model [20], we interpolate between theWe1=4 andRe1=5 scaling by using”
- Drop Impact on a Solid Surface (2016, unknown): “Ukiwe and Kwok (2005) ( We + 12 β = 8 + Extension of above model 3 1 model, θ d being the dynamical contact angle during spreading Clanet et al. (2004) β ∝ We 1 4 Mass balance using the impact capillary length.”
- On the elasticity of an inertial liquid shock (2006, background): “We instead propose that the drop, as it hits the solid, is subjected to an acceleration which scales as V (2)/R, since the velocity decreases from V to 0 over a distance of about R (Clanet et al. 2004).”
- Retraction dynamics of aqueous drops upon impact on non-wetting surfaces (2005, methodology): “A number of studies have considered the maximum spreading radius (see for instance Fukai et al. 1993; Roisman et al. 2002; Clanet et al. 2004).”
- Contact angle dynamics in droplets impacting on flat surfaces with different wetting characteristics (2006, methodology): “The maximal droplet spreading correlation (Dm/D0 ∼ We ∼ V 1/2 0 ) put forth by Clanet et al. (2004) is also shown in figure 6 as a dashed line.”
- Droplet impact dynamics on micropillared hydrophobic surfaces (2016, methodology): “Renardy et al. [11] studied the bouncing of water droplets on superhydrophobic surfaces; and reported pyramidal as well as toroidal shapes of the droplet, after it bounces off at low and moderate impact velocities.”
- Pancake bouncing on superhydrophobic surfaces (2014, unknown): “The timescale t max scales as independent of the impact velocity1,10–12,19.”
- Harvesting raindrop energy: experimental study (2008, background): “3 mm for a standard raindrop [12]).”
- Universal rescaling of drop impact on smooth and rough surfaces (2015, background): “Studies distinguish two main domains: the capillary regime at low impact velocity and the viscous regime at high impact velocity (Clanet et al. 2004).”