Effect of rice lines transformed with Bacillus thuringiensis toxin genes on the brown planthopper and its predator Cyrtorhinus lividipennis

By C. C. Bernal, R. Aguda, Michael B. Cohen. 2002

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Insect Science, Molecular Biology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd5567098947c3996245185206769a331e0ce32e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Insect Science

1. Jörg Romeis
2. S. Naranjo
3. M. Meissle
4. J. Ruberson
5. J. Torres
6. Franz Bigler
7. Angelika Hilbeck
8. A. Shelton

In Molecular Biology

1. S. Naranjo
2. Jörg Romeis
3. M. Meissle
4. J. Ruberson
5. J. Torres
6. Franz Bigler
7. A. Dutton
8. Angelika Hilbeck

Citations in the corpus

• Expression of Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac protein in cotton plants, acquisition by pests and predators: a tritrophic analysis (2006, background): “…or prey fed diet containing Cry proteins ( Sims, 1995, 1997; Pilcher et al ., 1997 ); and with predatory bugs, O. insidiosus , Orius majusculus (Reuter) and Cyrtorhinus lividipennis Reuter that consumed prey fed on Bt plants ( Zwahlen et al ., 2000; Pilcher et al ., 1997; Bernal et al ., 2002 ).”
• Genetically engineered crops help support conservation biological control (2019, background): “parvata lugens; Hemiptera: Delphacidae) on different Bt rice lines (Bernal et al., 2002; Tian et al., 2018a).”
• Ecological compatibility of GM crops and biological control (2009, unknown): “Specific studies reveal that the deleterious effects inflicted on parasitoids by GM crops occur as a result of reduced host quality (Bernal et al., 2002b; Setamou et al., 2002a, 2002b, 2002c; Baur and Boethel, 2003; Vojtech et al., 2005; Walker et al., 2007) rather than direct toxicity of…”
• The impact of transgenic plants on natural enemies: a critical review of laboratory studies (2005, unknown): “…(2003); 7, Pruetz & Dettner (2004); 8, Setamou et al. (2002a); 9, Setamou et al. (2002b); 10, Baur & Boethel (2003); 11, Schuler et al. (2003); 12, Bernal et al. (2002); 13, Tomov et al. (2003b); 14, Tomov et al. (2003a); 15, Bell et al. (2001a); 16, Bell et al. (2001b); 17, Bell et al. (2004);…”
• Another View on Bt Proteins - How Specific are They and What Else Might They Do? (2006, background): “Effects of transgenic Bt plants on parasitoids are assumed to be more likely because of the closer trophic relationship between parasitoid larvae and their hosts compared to pedators and their prey (Bernal et al., 2002b).”
• Major heretofore intractable biotic constraints to African food security that may be amenable to novel biotechnological solutions (2004, background): “Thus far, neither crystalline Bt proteins nor Vips have been identified to have homopteran activity (for example, see Bernal et al., 2002).”
• Assessing the risks of insect resistant transgenic plants on entomophagous arthropods Bt-maize expressing Cry1Ab as a case study (2003, background): “For example, in different varieties of transgenic rice containing different promoters (including CaMV 35S), results suggest that Bt-toxin is transported in phloem, as honeydew of phloem feeding insects was found to contain the toxin (Bernal et al., 2002).”