Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in prediction of tumour-free resection margin in rectal cancer surgery.

By R. Beets‐Tan, G. Beets, R. Vliegen, A. Kessels, H. Boven, A. D. Bruine, M. von Meyenfeldt, C. Baeten, J. V. van engelshoven. The Lancet, 2001

810 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Oncology, Surgery

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd4ca942ea6f209f9d1f7209086d996f80335e44

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

1. P. Quirke
2. P. Finan
3. D. Johnston
4. N. Scott
5. C. Abbott
6. N. Tiffin
7. W. Parsons
8. M. Dixon

Citations in the corpus

• Rates of Circumferential Resection Margin Involvement Vary Between Surgeons and Predict Outcomes in Rectal Cancer Surgery (2002, positive): “Recently the Stockholm group(10) have reported equivalent data, with a further study highlighting the importance of assessing the circumferential resection margin (CRM) before surgery.(11) Such variations in surgery clearly show the need to define a parameter that may be used as an immediate indicat”