CLIENT ATTACHMENT TO THERAPIST, DEPTH OF IN-SESSION EXPLORATION, AND OBJECT RELATIONS IN BRIEF PSYCHOTHERAPY
By Brent Mallinckrodt, M. Porter, D. Kivlighan. 2005
158 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd3701212517344ef8ee64ce61857105761064c6
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Clinical Psychology
- Meifen Wei
- Brent Mallinckrodt
- P. P. Heppner
- T. Anderson
- Gregory A. Goldman
- Daniel W. Russell
- Robyn A. Zakalik
- D. Vogel
In Social Psychology
- Meifen Wei
- Brent Mallinckrodt
- P. P. Heppner
- T. Anderson
- Gregory A. Goldman
- Daniel W. Russell
- Robyn A. Zakalik
- D. Vogel
Citations in the corpus
- Perceived coping as a mediator between attachment and psychological distress: A structural equation modeling approach (2003, background): “Clients who develop secure attachments to their therapists were found to engage in greater depth of exploration in the early phases of brief therapy ( Mallinckrodt, Porter, & Kivlighan, 2003 ).”
- Quality of Object Relations and Security of Attachment as Predictors of Early Therapeutic Alliance. (2007, methodology): “Although these researchers (Mallinckrodt et al., 1995) also administered the AAS, they did not investigate the relationship between the AAS and the WAI (Mallinckrodt et al., 1995, 2005).”
- The psychotherapy relationship as attachment: Evidence and implications (2010, background): “Further support can be seen in research showing that the client’s psychotherapy attachment is closely related to the working alliance, yet adds a significant increment in predicting depth of session exploration (Mallinckrodt et al., 2005).”
- Attachment, Social Competencies, Social Support, and Psychological Distress (2005, background): “Mallinckrodt, 2000, 2001; Mikulincer, Shaver, & Pereg, 2003) and research (Kobak, Cole, Ferenz-Gillies, Fleming, & Gamble, 1993; Mallinckrodt, Porter, & Kivlighan, 2005 ) suggests that persons who cannot maintain a secure attachment in close relationships engage in two possible secondary attachment”