A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of drug-eluting stents.
By M. Babapulle, L. Joseph, P. Belisle, J. Brophy, M. Eisenberg. The Lancet, 2004
693 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Surgery
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd35aa29379c571c768de0c3ee1857051de34a3a
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- S. Silber
- P. Camici
- P. Albertsson
- N. Mackman
- F. F. Avilés
- A. Colombo
- W. Wijns
- J. Marco
Citations in the corpus
- Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions. The Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. (2005, background): “Thus, not all Paclitaxel-eluting stents are equal.(383,384) Sirolimus has been clinically tested only by being eluted from a polymer carrier, like in the SIRIUS trial(385) (Table 16 ).”
- Triggers, targets and treatments for thrombosis (2008, background): “The drugs are designed to prevent smooth muscle cell proliferation and intimal hyperplasia, which lead to re-occlusion of the vessel (that is, to restenosis), and randomized clinical trials have shown that drug-eluting stents reduce the rate of restenosis compared with bare metal stent”