Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis
By S. Steegen, Francis Tuerlinckx, Andrew Gelman, Wolf Vanpaemel. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2016
1,096 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/926763d7946bdf19b0422f35df0b1e4145b324d0
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Robert A. I. Davies
- Lotte Meteyard
- Daniel P. Simpson
- Bin Yu
- Andrew Gelman
- Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
- Brian A. Nosek
- Matthew J. Denny
Citations in the corpus
- Bayesian Workflow (2020, methodology): “Instead of selecting just one model, we can perform a multiverse analysis and use all of the models and see how the conclusions change across the models (Steegen et al., 2016, Dragicevic et al., 2019, Kale, Kay, and Hullman, 2019).”
- Best practice guidance for linear mixed-effects models in psychological science (2019, background): “Steegen et al. (2016) described multiverse analyses, in which all possible data sets are constructed from a sampling of the alternative ways in which raw data can be”
- Text Preprocessing For Unsupervised Learning: Why It Matters, When It Misleads, And What To Do About It (2017, methodology): “We are certainly not alone in this broad concern: scholars in psychology, for example, have recently mooted the idea of running a given regression analysis on every possible data set that emerges from coding variables differently, and then comparing the resulting p-values (Steegen et al., 2016).(12)”
- Three principles of data science: predictability, computability, and stability (PCS) (2018, background): “Others have advocated evaluating re-sults across alternatively processed datasets under the name “multiverse analysis” (22).”
- Veridical data science (2019, background): “Others have advocated evaluating re-sults across alternatively processed datasets under the name “multiverse analysis” (23).”
- Thinking Clearly About Correlations and Causation: Graphical Causal Models for Observational Data (2017, background): “Jackson, Thoemmes, Jonkmann, Lüdtke, and Trautwein (2012) were interested in the effects of military training (in comparison with civilian community service) on personality.”
- Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking (2016, methodology): “…in previous publications (Kriegeskorte et al., 2009; Nieuwenhuis et al., 2011; Simmons et al., 2011; Wagenmakers et al., 2011; Bakker et al., 2012; John et al., 2012; Chambers, 2013; Francis, 2013; Bakker and Wicherts, 2014; Simonsohn et al., 2014; Steegen et al., 2016; van Aert et al., 2016).”
- Many Analysts, One Data Set: Making Transparent How Variations in Analytic Choices Affect Results (2018, methodology): “For a lone analyst working without the benefit of a crowd, we recommend use of a specification curve (Simonsohn, Simmons, & Nelson, 2016) or multiverse analysis (Steegen et al., 2016).”