Eating novel foods: An application of the Theory of Planned Behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product

By D. Menozzi, G. Sogari, M. Veneziani, E. Simoni, Cristina Mora. 2017

334 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Insect Science, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cd27afd40d15f5992bda21af18a6ea2a5a832e64

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. Marleen C. Onwezen
2. Heesup Han

In Insect Science

1. Diana Bogueva
2. Dora Vasileva Marinova
3. G. Sogari
4. Marleen C. Onwezen

In Social Psychology

1. Diana Bogueva
2. Dora Vasileva Marinova
3. G. Sogari
4. M. Reinders
5. Marleen C. Onwezen
6. Heesup Han

Citations in the corpus

• A Systematic Review on Consumer Acceptance of Alternative Proteins: Pulses, Algae, Insects, Plant-based Meat Alternatives, and Cultured Meat. (2020, background): “For example, 289 the belief that eating insects has health benefits (Menozzi et al., 2017; Schlup & Brunner, 290 2018) and environmental benefits (Menozzi et al., 2017; Sogari, 2016; Vanhonacker et al., 291 2013; Verbeke, 2015) significantly affects consumers’ intention to consume insects.”
• Australian Consumers’ Response to Insects as Food (2019, result): “In contrast with some previous studies which have indicated that women have higher insect aversions than men [50,51], the gender effect was not found to be of significant importance.”