Pollution Incidence and Political Jurisdiction: Evidence from the TRI

207 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The tragedy of the commons in international fisheries: an empirical examination. (2009, background): “…to depend on the ability to reduce international externalities (Murdoch and Sandler 1997a, 1997b) and studies have shown that international and interstate river pollution and toxic releases from border counties are higher than domestic pollution (Sigman 2002a, 2002b, Helland and Whitford 2003).”
The Environmental Performance of Polluting Plants: A Spatial Analysis (2007, background): “The importance of these border effects is examined by Kahn (1999), Sigman (2002, 2004), and Helland (2003).”
Polluting Thy Neighbor: Unintended Consequences of China's Pollution Reduction Mandates (2016, unknown): “A branch of the existing literature focuses on the “border effect” by examining differences in pollution levels or health outcomes between border and interior jurisdictions (Helland and Whitford, 2003; Kahn, 2004; Gray and Shadbegian, 2004).”
Pesticide Use and Health Outcomes: Evidence from Agricultural Water Pollution in China (2017, background): “It also speaks to the literature that identifies transboundary 5 water pollution spillover (Cai, Chen and Gong 2015; Helland and Whitford 2003; Kahn, Li and Zhao 2015).”
Transboundary spillovers and decentralization of environmental policies (2005, unknown): “Helland and Whitford [12] find toxic chemical releases to be higher in border counties, which they interpret as evidence of spillovers.”