Semantic Multimedia Information Retrieval Based on Contextual Descriptions
By Nadine Steinmetz, Harald Sack. 2013
35 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Information Retrieval & Search
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Denilson Barbosa
- Zhaochen Guo
- Axel-Cyrille Ngonga Ngomo
- Ricardo Usbeck
- Michael Röder
- Ivan Titov
- Phong Le
- Octavian-Eugen Ganea
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Information Retrieval & Search
Citations in the corpus
- GERBIL - Benchmarking Named Entity Recognition and Linking consistently (2017, methodology): “KEA NER/NED: This approach is the successor of the approach introduced in [58] which is based on a fine-granular context model taking into account heterogeneous text sources as well as text created by automated multimedia analysis.”
- End-to-End Neural Entity Linking (2018, unknown): “We compare with popular and state-of-the-art EL and ED public systems, e.g. WAT (Piccinno and Ferragina, 2014), Dbpedia Spotlight (Mendes et al., 2011), NERD-ML (van Erp et al., 2013), KEA (Steinmetz and Sack, 2013), AIDA (Hoffart et al., 2011), FREME, FOX (Speck and Ngomo, 2014), PBOH (Ganea et al.”
- Robust named entity disambiguation with random walks (2018, background): “The most commonly used local features include lexical features such as bag-of-words [2], keyphrases [15], n-grams [37], or semantic word embeddings [47] extracted or derived from the surrounding context, and statistical features such as the probability of entities given a mention from a knowledge gr”