Understanding mobility based on GPS data
By Yu Zheng, Quannan Li, Yukun Chen, Xing Xie, Wei-Ying Ma. Ubiquitous Computing, 2008
1,238 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Transportation, Signal Processing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccfef606b58af279018d5f40bb38f623422c1536
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
In Transportation
In Signal Processing
Citations in the corpus
- Representation learning for geospatial areas using large-scale mobility data from smart card (2016, background): “Introduction As the use of location-aware personal devices such as smartphones rapidly spreads, a large amount of mobility data, including GPS or cell tower logs, has been automatically accumulated [17, 8].”
- Toolkit to support intelligibility in context-aware applications (2010, background): “Decision trees are popular in applications to recognize: identity / ability ( e.g. , [8]), interruptibility ( e.g. , [2, 42]), mobility ( e.g. , [45]), etc .”
- Accelerometer-based transportation mode detection on smartphones (2013, methodology): “[36, 37] use as part of their GPSbased transportation mode detection approach.”
- Using mobile phones to determine transportation modes (2010, neutral): “…323 Hours 85% [Mun et al. 2008] Still, Walk, Motorized GSM, WiFi 2 13 Hours 83% [Liao et al. 2007] Walk, Motorized (Bus/Car) GPS, GIS 1 60 Days 84% [Zheng et al. 2008] Walk, Bike, Motorized GPS 65 10 Months 76% [Miluzzo et al. 2008] Still, Walk, Run Accelerometer 8 4 Hours 78% Our work expands…”
- Optimal Geo-Indistinguishable Mechanisms for Location Privacy (2014, methodology): “The GeoLife GPS Trajectories dataset contains 17621 traces from 182 users, moving mainly in the north-west of Beijing, China, in a period of over five years (from April 2007 to August 2012).”
- Predicting future locations with hidden Markov models (2012, neutral): “2011 [24, 23, 25].”
- Understanding Human Mobility from Twitter (2014, background): “Recently effort has focused on the study of human mobility using new tracking technologies such as mobile phones [1, 24], GPS [26, 2], Wifi [4], and RFID devices [3].”
- GeoLife: A Collaborative Social Networking Service among User, Location and Trajectory (2010, background): “Refer to papers [8, 11, 15] for details.”
- Urban Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications (2014, methodology): “Y. Zheng, Y. Chen, X. Xie, and W. Y. Ma. 2009a. GeoLife2.”
- Trajectory Data Mining (2015, methodology): “The dataset can be used to evaluate trajectory classification and activity recognition [Zheng et al. 2008a, 2008b].”
- Energy-efficient rate-adaptive GPS-based positioning for smartphones (2010, methodology): “[28] use supervised learning to infer motion modes (e.”
- Next place prediction using mobility Markov chains (2012, methodology): “The Geolife dataset [15] has been gathered by researchers from Microsoft Asia and consists of mobility traces collected from April 2007 to October 2011 using GPS-enabled devices, mostly in the area of Shanghai.”
- An Empirical Study of Geographic User Activity Patterns in Foursquare (2011, neutral): “ence with previous studies (Zheng et al. 2008), where user location was periodically sampled through GPS.”
- Understanding Mobile Traffic Patterns of Large Scale Cellular Towers in Urban Environment (2015, background): “Another type of data is the device-level metric obtained from mobile devices, such as device and application usage[8, 21], network access bandwidth[10], energy computation[11], personal GPS locations[28], etc.”
- Mining interesting locations and travel sequences from GPS trajectories (2009, background): “3 Application Scenarios The work reported in this paper is an important component of our project GeoLife [12][19][20][21], whose prototype has been internally accessible within Microsoft since Oct.”
- Inferring transportation modes from GPS trajectories using a convolutional neural network (2018, methodology): “It is worth noticing that the highest accuracy of both deep-learning-based studies (Endo et al., 2016; Hao et al., 2017) are still lower than the work of Zheng et al. (2008b), which is purely based on manual features.”