Size Selectivity, Injury, Handling Time, and Determinants of Initial Hooking Mortality in Recreational Angling for Northern Pike: The Influence of Type and Size of Bait
By Robert Arlinghaus, T. Klefoth, A. Kobler, S. Cooke. 2008
133 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Aquatic Science, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccdc45fa7321e87e4f03da44481dde82e7b668d5
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Aquatic Science
In Global and Planetary Change
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
Citations in the corpus
- Physiological and behavioural consequences of catch-and-release angling on northern pike (Esox lucius L.) (2009, unknown): “…C&R angling, there is a need to provide species-specific information on handling procedures and terminal gear configurations that minimize injury, air exposure and other potentially detrimental impacts on the fish (Cooke and Suski, 2005; Cooke and Schramm, 2007; Arlinghaus et al., 2007a, 2008a).”
- What makes fish vulnerable to capture by hooks? A conceptual framework and a review of key determinants (2017, background): “Fish are often more vulnerable to natural baits than to the artificial ones (Arlinghaus et al., 2008; Payer, Pierce, & Pereira, 1989), and there is a relationship between the vulnerability of fish and the type of artificial bait (Orsi et al.”
- Assessing evolutionary consequences of size-selective recreational fishing on multiple life-history traits, with an application to northern pike (Esox lucius) (2011, background): “Such a shift, to which we refer as trophy selectivity, may be expected, for example, when anglers start using large lures (Arlinghaus et al. 2008).”
- Abiotic and fishing-related correlates of angling catch rates in pike (Esox lucius) (2010, methodology): “However, this effect has been found to be rather hort term in pike, lasting a couple of days (Klefoth et al., 2008) r just some hours (Arlinghaus et al., 2008b, 2009).”
- The physiological consequences of catch‐and‐release angling: perspectives on experimental design, interpretation, extrapolation and relevance to stakeholders (2013, background): “To date, it appears macroscopic indicators of fish condition and injury (e.g. blood loss) offer more promise for predicting mortality (Arlinghaus et al. 2008) than traditional physiological measures in blood or muscle, but more work is required to clarify this observation.”
- Diversity and complexity of angler behaviour drive socially optimal input and output regulations in a bioeconomic recreational-fisheries model (2010, background): “In the past, however, recreational-fisheries researchers and managers have focused on the biological dimension of recreational fisheries, largely overlooking the ''human dimension'' (Aas and Ditton 1998; Cox and Walters 2002a; Arlinghaus et al. 2008a).”