Intentional behaviour in dog-human communication: an experimental analysis of “showing” behaviour in the dog

By Á. Miklósi, R. Polgárdi, J. Topál, V. Csányi. Animal Cognition, 2000

336 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental Biology, Genetics, Pharmacy

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ccb0c0394bca75a59b2a265acdaaf47b8f86c7ce

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental Biology

In Genetics

In Pharmacy

Citations in the corpus

Human-directed gazing behaviour in puppies and adult dogs, Canis lupus familiaris (2011, background): “This finding possibly indicates that the gazing carried a request-like meaning as has been found in other studies with adult dogs (Miklósi et al. 2000, 2003, 2004; Marshall-Pescini et al. 2009).”
Comparative social cognition: what can dogs teach us? (2004, background): “Based on the signals provided by dogs, experimentally naı̈ve owners were able to find a piece of hidden food (Miklósi et al. 2000).”
Description of the behaviour of domestic dog (Canis familiaris) by experienced and inexperienced people (2009, background): “In this period, a process of convergent evolution has probably led humans and dogs to develop similar cognitive abilities (Hare et al., 2002; Miklósi et al., 2000).”
Cognitive ability and awareness in domestic animals and decisions about obligations to animals (2010, background): “Dogs can do this by using human gaze direction (Miklósi et al., 2005a,b) but apes are not good at responding to a human in this way (Reid, 2009).”
The dog as a model for understanding human social behavior (2009, background): “Under these circumstances, dogs show many forms of behavior (gazing, gaze alternation, vocalization) that direct the attention of the human onto themselves or the problem to be solved (Miklósi et al., 2000).”
Clever hounds: social cognition in the domestic dog (Canis familiaris) (2003, background): “For example, Miklosi et al. (2000) found that dogs could use human signals such as pointing, orientation and even just glancing at a location to influence the target choice of dogs.”
When dogs seem to lose their nose: an investigation on the use of visual and olfactory cues in communicative context between dog and owner (2003, background): “Recently several studies reported that dogs show an outstanding performance in responding to human gestural (visual) cues (Hare and Tomasello, 1999; Miklósi et al., 1998, 2000; Soproni et al., 2001, 2002).”
Interaction between individual experience and social learning in dogs (2003, positive): “These suggestions are reflected in the ability of dogs to perceive and respond to human communicative gestures (Miklósi et al. 2000; Soproni et al. 2001, 2002) and probably to verbal utterances (Pongrácz et al. 2001a).”
Attachment to humans: a comparative study on hand-reared wolves and differently socialized dog puppies (2005, neutral): “13 03–3472/05/$30.00/0 2005 The Association for the S Topál et al. 1997; Naderi et al. 2001, 2002; social learning: Kubinyi et al. 2003; Pongrácz et al. 2003a, b; communication: Miklósi et al. 1998, 2000; Agnetta et al. 2001; Soproni et al. 2001, 2002).”