Implicit Bias in Crowdsourced Knowledge Graphs
By Gianluca Demartini. 2019
27 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Collaborative creation of knowledge is an approach which has been successfully demonstrated by crowdsourcing project like Wikipedia. Similar techniques have recently been adopted for the creation of collaboratively generated Knowledge Graphs like, for example, Wikidata. While such an approach enables the creation of high quality structured content, it also comes with the challenge of introducing contributors’ implicit bias in the generated Knowledge Graph. In this paper, we investigate how paid crowdsourcing can be used to understand contributor bias for controversial facts to be included into collaborative Knowledge Graphs. We propose methods to trace the provenance of crowdsourced fact checking thus enabling bias transparency rather than aiming at eliminating bias from the Knowledge Graph.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computer Science Applications, Management Science and Operations Research, Knowledge Graphs & Representation, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Naser Ahmadi
- Preslav Nakov
- Paolo Papotti
- Mohammed Saeed
- Francesca Toni
- Neema Kotonya
- Ihab F. Ilyas
- Xu Chu
In Computer Science Applications
In Management Science and Operations Research
In Knowledge Graphs & Representation
In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society
Citations in the corpus
- RuleBERT: Teaching Soft Rules to Pre-Trained Language Models (2021, methodology): “been used to mine the rules and compute their confidences (Janowicz et al., 2018; Demartini, 2019).”