The Quest for Efficient Boolean Satisfiability Solvers
By Lintao Zhang, Sharad Malik. International Conference on Computer Aided Verification, 2002
357 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc97d1eed8e0c679a706513ef50ed88a5c9471f2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- Clark W. Barrett
- Richard Jensen
- Sanjit A. Seshia
- Cesare Tinelli
- Roberto Sebastiani
- Baris Sertkaya
- Anni-Yasmin Turhan
- Qiang Shen
In Computational Theory and Mathematics
- Richard Jensen
- Qiang Shen
- Clark W. Barrett
- Cesare Tinelli
- Sanjit A. Seshia
- Roberto Sebastiani
- Qing Xu
- Jianhua Dai
Citations in the corpus
- Computing the Least Common Subsumer w.r.t. a Background Terminology (2004, background): “, [62]) can be used to handle non-implicational a priori knowledge.”
- SATzilla: Portfolio-based Algorithm Selection for SAT (2008, unknown): “…high-performance SAT solvers include tree-search algorithms (see, e.g., Davis, Logemann, & Loveland, 1962; Zhang, Madigan, Moskewicz, & Malik, 2001; Zhang, 2002; Kullmann, 2002; Dubois & Dequen, 2001; Heule, Zwieten, Dufour, & Maaren, 2004; Eén & Sörensson, 2003), local search algorithms (see,…”
- Handbook of satisfiability (2009, unknown): “, [78]), because in both cases two”
- Handbook of Satisfiability (2021, methodology): “3 shows an online T -DPLL procedure based on a modern DPLL engine [157, 158].”
- Computational Intelligence and Feature Selection - Rough and Fuzzy Approaches (2008, background): “Many other heuristics exist for this purpose [414] but are not considered here.”