The original ToBI system and the evolution of the ToBI framework

500 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Prosodic effects of focus in Dutch declaratives (2008, background): “Off-ramp analyses, which take the fall to reflect the morphological and phonological element, were standardly assumed in the British tradition (e.g., 'the high fall' in [13]) and within the autosegmental tradition in ToDI [14], rather than an on-ramp analysis, as in ToBI [15].”
Intonational phonology of French: Developing a ToBI system for French (2015, background): “…here is couched in the Autosegmental Metrical framework of intonational phonology and observes the standard ToBI conventions (e.g. the labels are intended to represent phonological distinctions rather than differences in phonetic realisation) (Beckman & Hirschberg 1994, Beckman et al. 2005).”
Pragmatic aspects of temporal accommodation in turn-taking (2011, methodology): “In our corpus, we define P-centers as the amplitude peaks of the stressed syllables in all words that receive a pitch accent mark in the labeling of the prosodic structure using the ToBI scheme (Beckman et al., 2004).”