Single-photon Kerr nonlinearities do not help quantum computation
By Jeffrey H. Shapiro. 2006
290 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc858f190c7502a07b05683754c449a56c71e1d4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
- A. Reiserer
- P. Lodahl
- Nicolas Sangouard
- Dirk Englund
- Michael Hochberg
- M. Pant
- T. Baehr‐Jones
- Jacob Mower
In Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- A. Reiserer
- P. Lodahl
- Nicolas Sangouard
- Wolfgang Tittel
- C. Simon
- Michael Hochberg
- Dirk Englund
- T. Baehr‐Jones
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Michael Hochberg
- Dirk Englund
- M. Pant
- T. Baehr‐Jones
- Jacob Mower
- Gregory R. Steinbrecher
- G. Rempe
- Nicholas Christopher Harris
Citations in the corpus
- Large-scale quantum photonic circuits in silicon (2016, background): “Photon loss and mode distortion [8, 9] can cause gate errors, but heralded gates [10] may help.”
- Cavity-based quantum networks with single atoms and optical photons (2014, background): “Therefore, the observation of nonlinear switching explained above is fundamentally restricted to a subensemble of all events (Rosenblum et al., 2011; Shapiro, 2006).”
- Prospective applications of optical quantum memories (2013, background): “icantly the phase of the re-emitted light pulse. The idea dates back to 1998 [110], but an experimental implementation at the single-photon level is still awaited. Several problems need to be solved [111, 112]. The main one is the multi-mode character of the light pulses that prevents the realizatio”
- Quantum-dot based photonic quantum networks (2017, background): “photon bound state contributions has been interpreted as essentially a ‘no-go theorem’ for quantum computation [65].”