Moral Injury: An Integrative Review.

By Brandon J. Griffin, Natalie Purcell, Kristine Burkman, B. Litz, Craig J. Bryan, M. Schmitz, Claudia Villierme, Jessica Walsh, S. Maguen. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 2019

616 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Individuals who are exposed to traumatic events that violate their moral values may experience severe distress and functional impairments known as "moral injuries." Over the last decade, moral injury has captured the attention of mental health care providers, spiritual and faith communities, media outlets, and the general public. Research about moral injury, especially among military personnel and veterans, has also proliferated. For this article, we reviewed scientific research about moral injury. We identified 116 relevant epidemiological and clinical studies. Epidemiological studies described a wide range of biological, psychological/behavioral, social, and religious/spiritual sequelae associated with exposure to potentially morally injurious events. Although a dearth of empirical clinical literature exists, some authors debated how moral injury might and might not respond to evidence-based treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) whereas others identified new treatment models to directly address moral repair. Limitations of the literature included variable definitions of potentially morally injurious events, the absence of a consensus definition and gold-standard measure of moral injury as an outcome, scant study of moral injury outside of military-related contexts, and clinical investigations limited by small sample sizes and unclear mechanisms of therapeutic effect. We conclude our review by summarizing lessons from the literature and offering recommendations for future research.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc83de0923ad9ed6f57a0835d767e2b424daeb2b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. P. Pihkala
2. S. Clayton
3. Caroline Hickman

In Sociology and Political Science

1. P. Pihkala
2. S. Clayton
3. Caroline Hickman
4. Pihkala Panu

Citations in the corpus

• Climate anxiety in children and young people and their beliefs about government responses to climate change: a global survey. (2021, positive): “28 This might include an awareness of or failure to prevent harmful unethical behaviour.”