Customized Computer-Based Administration of the PCL-5 for the Efficient Assessment of PTSD: A Proof-of-Principle Study

By M. Finkelman, S. Lowe, Wonsuk Kim, O. Gruebner, N. Smits, S. Galea. 2017

6 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Epidemiology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

1. S. Galea
2. Murray B. Stein
3. S. Lowe
4. Ronald C. Kessler

In Clinical Psychology

1. Brian Marx
2. Murray B. Stein
3. T. Keane
4. I. Hwang
5. S. Galea
6. S. Lowe
7. Ronald C. Kessler
8. Berk Ustun

In Epidemiology

1. Brian Marx
2. Murray B. Stein
3. Berk Ustun
4. T. Keane

Citations in the corpus

• Developing an optimal short-form of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) (2019, background): “To reduce respondent burden, several short‐ form (2–6 item) versions of the DSM‐IV PCL (Bliese et al., 2008; Lang & Stein, 2005) and PCL‐5 (Price, Szafranski, van Stolk‐Cooke, & Gros, 2016) have been created along with a computer‐adaptive version of the PCL‐5 (Finkelman et al., 2017, 2018).”
• Item Ordering and Computerized Classification Tests With Cluster-Based Scoring: An Investigation of the Countdown Method (2017, methodology): “…however, to stop early if one of the potential test results (either positive or negative) becomes disproportionately probable; such a rule, mentioned briefly in the Introduction as stochastic curtailment, is more aggressive than the countdown method (Butcher et al., 1985; Finkelman et al., 2016).”