Geographic Dispersion of Economic Shocks: Evidence from the Fracking Revolution

284 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Male Earnings, Marriageable Men, and Nonmarital Fertility: Evidence from the Fracking Boom (2018, methodology): “This is consistent with positive spillover effects on other earning opportunities, as documented in Feyrer et al. (2017).”
Who Needs a Fracking Education? The Educational Response to Low-Skill-Biased Technological Change (2020, unknown): “CZ level to capture the local economic impacts of fracking (Feyrer et al. 2017). We focus on 17- and 18-year-olds to balance two competing desires: 1) to consider an age group in which an educational decision is salient; and 2) to minimize the chances of bias from selective migration in response to ”
Commuting, Migration, and Local Employment Elasticities (2018, background): “Using the commuting probability (10), expected utility (15), the price index (8) and land market clearing (5), the change in the common level of welfare across all locations from the shock to commuting costs can be decomposed as follows: b U = 1 b ii 1 1 b ii 1 b wi b vi 1 b L 1 i R̂(1) i ; (30) w”