On the Importance of the Pearson Correlation Coefficient in Noise Reduction

By Jacob Benesty, Jingdong Chen, Yiteng Huang. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 2008

413 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Noise reduction, which aims at estimating a clean speech from noisy observations, has attracted a considerable amount of research and engineering attention over the past few decades. In the single-channel scenario, an estimate of the clean speech can be obtained by passing the noisy signal picked up by the microphone through a linear filter/transformation. The core issue, then, is how to find an optimal filter/transformation such that, after the filtering process, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) is improved but the desired speech signal is not noticeably distorted. Most of the existing optimal filters (such as the Wiener filter and subspace transformation) are formulated from the mean-square error (MSE) criterion. However, with the MSE formulation, many desired properties of the optimal noise-reduction filters such as the SNR behavior cannot be seen. In this paper, we present a new criterion based on the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC). We show that in the context of noise reduction the squared PCC (SPCC) has many appealing properties and can be used as an optimization cost function to derive many optimal and suboptimal noise-reduction filters. The clear advantage of using the SPCC over the MSE is that the noise-reduction performance (in terms of the SNR improvement and speech distortion) of the resulting optimal filters can be easily analyzed. This shows that, as far as noise reduction is concerned, the SPCC-based cost function serves as a more natural criterion to optimize as compared to the MSE.

Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Computational Mechanics, Signal Processing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc6e09308ef1027157849ec40bfa3553e200b72d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Biomedical Engineering

  1. Sofiène Affes
  2. Mehrez Souden
  3. Jacob Benesty
  4. John R. Hershey
  5. Jonathan Le Roux
  6. Hakan Erdogan

In Computational Mechanics

  1. Sofiène Affes
  2. Mehrez Souden
  3. Jacob Benesty
  4. John R. Hershey
  5. Jonathan Le Roux
  6. Hakan Erdogan

In Signal Processing

  1. Sofiène Affes
  2. Mehrez Souden
  3. Jacob Benesty
  4. John R. Hershey
  5. Jonathan Le Roux
  6. Hakan Erdogan
  7. Isao Yamada
  8. Nobuhiko Ogura

Citations in the corpus