Re-analysis of polarization in the γ-ray flux of GRB 021206

By R. Rutledge, D. Fox. 2003

135 citations recorded by the source corpus.

A previous analysis of the Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager (RHESSI) observation of GRB 021206 found that the γ-ray flux was 80 ± 20 per cent polarized. We re-examine these data and find no signal that can be interpreted as due to polarization. First, we find that the number of scattering events suitable for measuring polarization – having been scattered from one detector to another, with a count produced in both – is considerably lower than estimated by Coburn & Boggs, by a factor of 10 (830 ± 150, versus 9840 ± 96). The signal-to-noise ratio of the data set is thus too low to produce a detection, even from a 100 per cent polarized source. None the less, we develop a polarization-detection analysis limited in sensitivity only by Poisson noise, which does not require a spacecraft mass model to detect polarization, as in Coburn & Boggs. We find no signal which might be interpreted as due to polarization of GRB 021206. Separately, we reproduce the Coburn & Boggs signal and show that it is not due to polarization. Rather, the Coburn & Boggs signal is consistent with the previously neglected systematic uncertainty in the ‘null light curve’ used for detection. Due to the low signal-to-noise ratio of the RHESSI data, our Poisson noise-limited analysis results in an upper limit consistent with 100 per cent polarization of the γ-ray flux from GRB 021206. Thus, no observational constraint on the polarization of GRB 021206 can be derived from these data.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc5e723eb41e77b7e5f7f9f3a09a94873a428a68

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. Bing Zhang
  2. Huirong Yan
  3. K. Toma
  4. D. Mattingly
  5. Pawan Kumar
  6. Giovanni Amelino-Camelia
  7. T. Jacobson
  8. E. Liang

Citations in the corpus