Field validation of dosaviña, a decision support system to determine the optimal volume rate for pesticide application in vineyards

By E. Gil, J. Llorens, A. Landers, J. Llop, L. Giralt. 2011

67 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc4fc0ec9ae5d9639918bcf4a8bfbef2f327285a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

1. Ilaria Pertot

In Plant Science

1. T. Caffi
2. Vittorio Rossi
3. Ilaria Pertot
4. D. Thiéry

Citations in the corpus

• Critical Success Factors for the Adoption of Decision Tools in IPM (2019, methodology): “[85]; (ii) pesticide efficacy models [86]; (iii) tools for defining the application rate of pesticides like the tree row volume and leaf wall area calculators [87,88]; and (iv) tools for calibration and setting of sprayers to optimize pesticide distribution on crops [89].”
• A critical review of plant protection tools for reducing pesticide use on grapevine and new perspectives for the implementation of IPM in viticulture (2017, background): “Another group of DSSs were developed with the speci fi c aim of adapting the fungicide dose to the vine canopy characteristics, such as Dosavina (Gil et al., 2011), LAI adapted dosage (Siegfried et al., 2007), and Optidose ® (Davy et al., 2010).”