Conflict and Control

By Michael P. Johnson. Violence against Women, 2006

757 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Health, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc4fb49f0ddea1616aed8b256129b469c8bb08c0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Health

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Controversies Involving Gender and Intimate Partner Violence in the United States (2010, background): “Recently, many have argued that the explosion of typology research may provide a way to integrate gender-by-sample disparate findings about intimate partner violence (Cavanaugh and Gelles 2005; Holtzworth-Munroe and Stuart 1994; Jacobson and Gottman 1998; Johnson 2005; Johnson 2006; Kelly and Johnso”
Male Victims of Domestic Violence (2013, background): “1980) and that there might be a gender symmetry and asymmetry in DV (Johnson 2006) with a broad spectrum of abusive behaviours, we only focused on unilateral violence against men.”
Validity Concerns in the Measurement of Women’s and Men’s Report of Intimate Partner Violence (2013, background): “Kelly and Johnson (2008) reviewed the empirical research that had expanded on Johnson’s (1995) early demarcation of couple conflict from intimate terrorism to the delineation of four patterns of physical and nonphysical violence based on coercive control (Johnson 2006).”
Young People’s Online and Face-to-Face Experiences of Interpersonal Violence and Abuse and Their Subjective Impact Across Five European Countries (2017, background): “Others have argued that, due to this gender divide, women’s ability to successfully use coercive control is, in practice, severely limited (Johnson, 1995, 2006; Kelly & Johnson, 2008) as they lack the “social facility to impose comprehensive levels of deprivation, exploitation and dominance”…”
Partner violence against heterosexual and gay men: Prevalence and correlates (2012, methodology): “This agency data has been suggested to be more representative of female victims of IPV (Johnson, 2006), due to representing higher levels of “intimate terrorism” (Johnson, 2006, p. 1006), which is thought to be more often perpetrated by men against women (Johnson, 2006).”
Defining High Conflict (2010, background): “Johnson (2006) cites “the refusal to submit to another's rules, requests, or demands” as a defining feature of high conflict couples (p.”
Coercive Control in Same-Sex Intimate Partner Violence (2013, result): “…related to the dimensions of control outlined in the “Power and Control Wheel” (Pence and Paymar 1986), which was used as a conceptual framework to ensure that the included items adequately covered the spectrum of controlling behaviors, which is consistent with previous research by Johnson (2006).”
College Women’s Experiences of Dating Violence in Casual and Exclusive Relationships (2012, result): “Second, our data are likely to under-represent the most severe forms of violent behavior, similar to adult surveys under-representing the extent of patriarchal terrorism in intimate relationships (Johnson, 2006). It may be that women’s experience with violence as victims only is less present in our ”
Gender and types of intimate partner violence: A response to an anti-feminist literature review (2011, methodology): “[O]ne can err by assuming that the patterns observed in agency samples describe all partner violence ” (Johnson, 2006a, pp. 1010 – 1011).”