Traits of butterfly communities change from specialist to generalist characteristics with increasing land-use intensity

By C. Börschig, Alexandra-Maria Klein, H. Wehrden, Jochen Krauss. 2013

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Abstract Land-use intensification leads to species loss and shifts in community composition, but only few studies examine how these dynamics affect ecological and life-history traits. We thus investigated whether ecological and life-history traits differ between butterfly communities of grasslands with different land-use intensity. We conducted butterfly transect surveys in 137 grassland sites in three regions of Germany and compiled 10 species-specific ecological and life-history traits from the literature. These traits are associated with food plant specialisation, dispersal, distribution, reproduction and development. We calculated a land-use intensity gradient based on the amount of fertilise mowing frequency and grazing intensity. We analysed differences of traits characteristics between butterfly communities along the land-use intensity gradient in a fourth-corner analysis, thus considering correlations between traits. Six ecological and life-history traits changed from characteristics associated with specialists to such associated with generalists with increasing land-use intensity. These traits characteristics in intensified grasslands were: high dispersal propensity, large distribution range, low population density, more than one generation per year, hibernation in a more advanced developmental stage and a long flight period. The functional homogenisation of the butterfly communities with changes from specialist to generalist trait characteristics with increasing land-use intensity may have severe consequences for ecosystem functioning and services.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc4a12537b7883c491478877fa5c94a75399095f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

  1. Alexandra-Maria Klein
  2. T. Tscharntke
  3. N. Blüthgen
  4. K. Fiedler
  5. Jochen Krauss
  6. C. Westphal
  7. Kirsten Jung
  8. O. Bossdorf

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

  1. Alexandra-Maria Klein
  2. T. Tscharntke
  3. Jochen Krauss
  4. M. Fischer
  5. O. Bossdorf
  6. K. Fiedler
  7. C. Westphal
  8. N. Blüthgen

In Plant Science

  1. Alexandra-Maria Klein
  2. T. Tscharntke
  3. C. Westphal
  4. Jochen Krauss
  5. N. Blüthgen
  6. O. Bossdorf
  7. W. Weisser
  8. K. Fiedler

Citations in the corpus