Seasonal fluctuations in live and dead biomass of Phragmites australis as described by a growth and decomposition model: implications of duration of aerobic conditions for litter mineralization and…

By T. Asaeda, L. Nam, P. Hietz, N. Tanaka, S. Karunaratne. 2002

113 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Modeling growth and carbon allocation in two reed beds (Phragmites australis) in the Scheldt estuary (2004, unknown): “005 per day) were the same as inAsaeda et al. (2002) . These rates are an order of magnitude smaller than root respiration rates observed for seedlings by Romero et al. (1999) . Shoot respiration was initially set to a low value of 0.0025 per day. After calibration, all these values were at the lowe”
The Effect of Summer Harvesting of Phragmites australis on Growth Characteristics and Rhizome Resource Storage (2005, background): “Previous studies (Husak, 1978; Bjorndahl, 1985; Gryseels, 1989a, b; Asaeda & Karunaratne, 2000; Asaeda et al., 2002, 2003) have suggested the best season to cut, but they are conflicting.”
DIEL MINERALIZATION PATTERNS OF STANDING-DEAD PLANT LITTER: IMPLICATIONS FOR CO2 FLUX FROM WETLANDS (2004, background): “Much of the dead plant matter remains in an aerial standing-dead position for extended periods (Newell 1993), resulting in conspicuously large amounts of standing-dead plant matter in wetland habitats for much of the year (e.g., Findlay et al. 1990, Windham 2001, Asaeda et al. 2002).”