Activity–composition relations for phases in petrological calculations: an asymmetric multicomponent formulation

By T. Holland, Roger S. Powell. 2003

1,370 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Geophysics, Mechanics of Materials

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc28bdcd55b1d719be6189eb3ac3765beb191299

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Geophysics

1. L. Stixrude
2. C. Lithgow‐Bertelloni
3. E. Jennings
4. Edgar Dachs
5. H. Kroll
6. A. Benisek
7. T. Holland
8. J. A. Connolly

In Mechanics of Materials

1. C. Lithgow‐Bertelloni
2. L. Stixrude
3. E. Jennings
4. Edgar Dachs
5. H. Kroll
6. A. Benisek
7. T. Holland

Citations in the corpus

• Thermodynamics of mantle minerals - II. Phase equilibria (2011, methodology): “We have chosen the asymmetric van Laar formulation because it is parametrically compact while solving a long-standing problem in the representation of the excess properties of solutions with more than two components (Holland & Powell 2003).”
• A ternary feldspar-mixing model based on calorimetric data: development and application (2010, methodology): “has been successfully applied to high-grade metamorphic rocks by Kroll et al. (1993), Voll et al.”
• A Simple Thermodynamic Model for Melting of Peridotite in the System NCFMASOCr (2015, methodology): “The non-ideality is expressed as an asymmetric van Laar model, using the formalism of Holland & Powell (2003).”