Morphogenetic modifications induced by Pseudomonas fluorescens A6RI and Glomus mosseae BEG12 in the root system of tomato differ according to plant growth conditions

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Influence of PGPR and AMF on antioxidant activity, lycopene and potassium contents in tomato (2010, background): “inoculation of PGPRs have also been reported in various crops, for examples tomato (Gamalero et al., 2004), potato (Kundu and Gaur, 1980), rice (Tiwari et al.”
Plant-driven selection of microbes (2009, background): “1999), improve root branching (Gamalero et al. 2002), or present antifungal properties (Budi et al.”
Suppression of Rhizoctonia root-rot of tomato by Glomus mossae BEG12 and Pseudomonas fluorescens A6RI is associated with their effect on the pathogen growth and on the root morphogenesis (2005, methodology): “In the absence of pathogen, controversial data are reported in the literature about the beneficial effect of AM fungi on the growth of tomato (Trotta et al., 1996; Gamalero et al., 2002).”
Plant root growth, architecture and function (2009, background): “dynamic complexity: for example, Ge et al. (2000) showed the effect of altered gravitropism of the basal roots of bean plants in P acquisition efficiency; Somma et al.”
Beneficial Soil Microorganisms, an Ecological Alternative for Soil Fertility Management (2011, background): “The co-inoculation doubled or tripled the P content value compared to controls Gamalero et al. (2004)”