On the interpretation of panel unit root tests

By M. Pesaran. 2012

128 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc0ebea2b1923b502555e3facb041f21f8c220c4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Yiannis Karavias
2. Vasilis Sarafidis
3. Artūras Juodis
4. Daniel Hoechle

Citations in the corpus

• How does carbon dioxide emission change with the economic development? Statistical experiences from 132 countries (2013, unknown): “optimal interpretation of the results (Pesaran, 2012).”
• A homogeneous approach to testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels (2020, background): “Similarly to the case of panel unit root testing, rejection of the null hypothesis should be interpreted as evidence of the existence of a large enough number of cross-sectional units i in which the null hypothesis is violated (see e.g. Pesaran (2012)).”