Development and validation of the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS).

By D. Watson, M. O’Hara, L. Simms, R. Kotov, M. Chmielewski, Elizabeth McDade-Montez, Wakiza Gámez, S. Stuart. Psychological Assessment, 2007

733 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cc04de4bf70c744642c3a16066475d74a10aa892

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Maarten Vansteenkiste
2. Bart Soenens
3. L. Clark
4. Eiko I. Fried
5. D. Watson
6. J. van der Kaap-Deeder
7. A. Cramer
8. S. Reise

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. Eiko I. Fried
2. Maarten Vansteenkiste
3. Bart Soenens
4. A. Cramer
5. R. Nesse
6. L. Clark
7. Sacha Epskamp
8. S. Reise

Citations in the corpus

• Examining the role of psychological need satisfaction in sleep: A Self-Determination Theory perspective (2015, methodology): “Further, consistent with available measures in the field, such as the commonly used Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) (Buysse, Reynolds, Monk, Berman, & Kupfer, 1989), we also included various indicators of day-time dysfunction, including the Insomnia and Lassitude subscales of the Inventory of ”
• The Rediscovery of Bifactor Measurement Models (2012, methodology): “For example, Simms, Gros, Watson, and O’Hara (2008) used confirmatory bifactor modeling to explore the relative contribution of general and group factors in affecting responses to the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (Watson et al., 2007).”
• Depression sum-scores don’t add up: why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential (2015, background): “For instance, suicidal tendencies are measured via 6 different items [129], allowing for a more reliable measurement.”
• Constructing Validity: New Developments in Creating Objective Measuring Instruments (2019, methodology): “All participants completed the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms (IDAS; Watson et al., 2007).”
• Postpartum depression: current status and future directions. (2013, methodology): “Recent work with the Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms suggests an overarching factor that encompasses the diversity of depression symptoms”
• Moving Forward: Challenges and Directions for Psychopathological Network Theory and Methodology (2017, background): “The Inventory of Depression and Anxiety Symptoms provides a good example for a rating scale that could be used for such a purpose: It uses multiple questions per symptom domain and for instance taps suicidal tendencies with six different items (Watson et al., 2007) that could be combined into a late”