Experimental investigation of the performance limitation of DPSK systems due to nonlinear phase noise

By Hoon Kim, Alan H. Gnauck. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, 2003

215 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Electronic compensation technique to mitigate nonlinear phase noise (2002, methodology): “While the foregoing discussion has focused on BPSK, the use of DPSK has generated much more interest recently [4]- [9].”
Advanced Modulation Formats for High-Capacity Optical Transport Networks (2006, background): “The nonlinear transmission of phase modulation formats is affected mainly by nonlinear phase noise [119], [122] (at 10 Gb/s) and by IFWM (at 40 Gb/s and higher).”
Optical phase-shift-keyed transmission (2005, background): “11(a) shows an experiment that demonstrates Gordon-Mollenauer nonlinear phase noise in a DPSK system [46].”
Spectral efficiency limits and modulation/detection techniques for DWDM systems (2004, background): “While SPM-induced nonlinear phase noise has received the most attention recently [62], [64]–[70], there have been few studies on XPM-induced nonlinear phase noise [63].”
A comparative study of DPSK and OOK WDM transmission over transoceanic distances and their performance degradations due to nonlinear phase noise (2003, background): “We note that it is known that the p.d.f. of the DPSK is not Gaussian [ 28 ].”
Comparison of return-to-zero differential phase-shift keying and ON-OFF keying in long-haul dispersion managed transmission (2003, background): “This improvement, however, is reduced when the Gordon‐Mollenauer effect becomes dominant [ 13 ].”