Finite element and NURBS approximations of eigenvalue, boundary-value, and initial-value problems
By Thomas J. R. Hughes, John A. Evans, Alessandro Reali. 2014
235 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Mechanics of Materials
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbf7417ed52244dcdd6508550b0071562730b787
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Computational Mechanics
- Dominik Schillinger
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- Giancarlo Sangalli
- Martin Ruess
- René Rinke Hiemstra
- Francesco Calabrò
- Stefano Serra-Capizzano
- Carlo Garoni
In Electrical and Electronic Engineering
In Mechanics of Materials
- Thomas J. R. Hughes
- Giancarlo Sangalli
- Dominik Schillinger
- Martin Ruess
- René Rinke Hiemstra
- Francesco Calabrò
- Mattia Tani
- Stefano Serra-Capizzano
Citations in the corpus
- Fast formation and assembly of finite element matrices with application to isogeometric linear elasticity (2019, background): “In particular, several investigations have demonstrated superior robustness and accuracy per degree of freedom [9, 30, 36], and excellent spectral behavior has been shown in a number of studies [19, 23, 31, 32] explaining the excellent results ob20 tained in applications such as structural dynamics ”
- Generalized locally Toeplitz sequences : Theory and applications (2017, background): “Among other things, it was shown in [45, 55] that block Toeplitz structures allow one to provide a symbol-based explanation of the so-called spectral (acoustical/optical) branches, numerically observed by engineers in [64, 65].”
- The Finite Cell Method: A Review in the Context of Higher-Order Structural Analysis of CAD and Image-Based Geometric Models (2015, background): “Moreover, isogeometri c analysis turned out to be a superior computational mechanics technology, which on a per-degree-of-freedom basis exhibits increased accuracy and robustness in comparison to standard finite elements [36, 52, 63, 79, 100, 155, 160].”