Patch area, population density and the scaling of migration rates: the resource concentration hypothesis revisited

By P. Hambäck, G. Englund. 2005

225 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbf4ef641ac38ee5a582b9ede7ef9406918c0f50

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Synthesis and future research directions linking tree diversity to growth, survival, and damage in a global network of tree diversity experiments (2018, background): “The resource concentration hypothesis (Hambäck and Englund, 2005; Root, 1973) states that herbivores are more likely to immigrate into and less likely to emigrate from patches where their resources are more concentrated.”
Sex and sociality in a disconnected world: A review of the impacts of habitat fragmentation on animal social interactions (2007, background): “…these changes in distribution and abundance, such as edge effects (Fletcher et al. 2007), patchpopulation connectivity (Stacey and Taper 1992; Stow et al. 2001; Tallmon et al. 2002; Banks et al. 2005b), resource availability (Hamback and Englund 2005), and genetic diversity (Frankham et al. 2002).”
How do local habitat management and landscape structure at different spatial scales affect fritillary butterfly distribution on fragmented wetlands? (2008, background): “…relationships for insects show positive, negative, non-linear or non-significant relationships (Connor et al. 2000; Debinski and Holt 2000; Hambäck and Englund 2005), with population densities of species being variable through time and being dependent on landscape and species-specific…”
Forest biodiversity, ecosystem functioning and the provision of ecosystem services (2017, background): “This mechanism thus occurs within a patch (or ‘stand’), depending on insects’ movement between resources, resource perception and dietary preferences (Hambäck and Englund 2005; Verschut et al. 2016).”
Landscape-scale interactions of spatial and temporal cropland heterogeneity drive biological control of cereal aphids (2017, background): “For example, cereal aphids with strong local growth should have a hump-shaped relationship with increasing field size (Hamb€ack & Englund 2005), especially when natural enemies concentrate close to field borders (Segoli & Rosenheim 2012).”