VerilogEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Verilog Code Generation

By Mingjie Liu, Nathaniel Ross Pinckney, Brucek Khailany, Haoxing Ren. arXiv.org, 2023

411 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The increasing popularity of large language models (LLMs) has paved the way for their application in diverse domains. This paper proposes a benchmarking framework tailored specifically for evaluating LLM performance in the context of Verilog code generation for hardware design and verification. We present a comprehensive evaluation dataset consisting of 156 problems from the Verilog instructional website HDLBits. The evaluation set consists of a diverse set of Verilog code generation tasks, ranging from simple combinational circuits to complex finite state machines. The Verilog code completions can be automatically tested for functional correctness by comparing the transient simulation outputs of the generated design with a golden solution. We also demonstrate that the Verilog code generation capability of pretrained language models could be improved with supervised fine-tuning by bootstrapping with LLM generated synthetic problem-code pairs.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cbd81507197e2d32b6f6c8ac99039f3a607ee8f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Siddharth Garg
  2. Brendan Dolan-Gavitt
  3. Bryan Catanzaro
  4. Benjamin Tan
  5. Ramesh Karri
  6. Robert Kirby
  7. Baleegh Ahmad
  8. Brucek Khailany

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. Brendan Dolan-Gavitt
  2. Siddharth Garg
  3. Ramesh Karri
  4. Brucek Khailany

Citations in the corpus