Phylogeny of the Decapoda reptantia: Resolution using three molecular loci and morphology

168 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Further problems with the incongruence length difference test: “hypercongruence” effect and multiple comparisons (2006, methodology): “Under this interpretation, the ILD test was used to select among transition ⁄ transversion costs (e.g., Allard and Carpenter, 1996; Ahyong and O’Meally, 2004), or determine the quality of a given source of data (e.g., Quicke and Belshaw, 1999).”
A Classification of Living and Fossil Genera of Decapod Crustaceans (2009, background): “…knowledge of anomurans: 1) based on morphological and molecular data, the Anomura and Brachyura both appear to be monophyletic sister clades (Ahyong & O’Meally, 2004; Ahyong, Schnabel et al., 2009; Dixon et al., 2003; Scholtz & Richter, 1995; Schram, 2001), the two jointly forming a clade…”
HERMIT CRAB PHYLOGENY: A REAPPRAISAL AND ITS “FALL-OUT” (2007, methodology): “For example, selection of the genera Pylocheles A. Milne-Edwards, 1880 and/or Cheiroplatea Bate, 1888 as representative of Pylochelidae for the character accessory tooth on the crista dentata would have led us to score the family as lacking an accessory tooth as did Ahyong and O’Meally (2004).”
Phylogeny of the Infraorder Caridea Based on Mitochondrial and Nuclear Genes (Crustacea: Decapoda) (2009, background): “These approaches have gained popularity over single gene studies because of their potential to resolve phylogenies at different taxonomic levels (Ahyong & O’Meally 2004; Porter et al. 2005).”