The Right to Development in a Climate Constrained World: The Greenhouse Development Rights Framework

By Sivan Kartha, P. Baer, T. Athanasiou, E. Kemp-Benedict. 2007

273 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSIS AND CARBON FOOTPRINTING: AN OVERVIEW OF APPLICATIONS (2009, unknown): “Baer et al. (2007) and Chakravarty et al. (2009), for example, present frameworks for allocating a global GHG reduction target to nations, in which the principle of ‘common but differentiated responsibilities’ as established in the Kyoto Protocol refers to emissions of individuals instead of…”
Equity in climate change: an analytical review (2010, methodology): “In this paper, we will start with the individual as the building block for any equity consideration is the individual (Cao, 2008; Chakravarti et al 2009; Baer et al.2007).”
Payments for ecosystem services as commodity fetishism (2010, background): “…in a carbon emissions constrained world, they could impose a much quicker decrease in carbon emissions in developed countries and they would potentially see how the resources available for forest conservation would increase if cooperative trading frameworks were developed (Baer et al., 2007).”
Livestock-related greenhouse gas emissions: impacts and options for policy makers (2009, background): “NGOs and policy observers have proposed their own frameworks, of which perhaps the most famous is the Contraction and Convergence proposal (Global Commons Institute, http://www.gci.org.uk/contconv/cc.html), although there are also variants (Baer et al., 2007).”