Range use and movement rates of woodland caribou in Saskatchewan

By W. Rettie, F. Messier. 2001

117 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Small Animals

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb9a5d596dc7db1a17c2cb3883dcd1a6a80d94c2

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. C. Dussault
2. J. Ouellet
3. Johan Lind
4. Steeve D. Côté
5. A. Massé
6. R. Courtois
7. D. Fortin
8. S. Ferguson

In Small Animals

1. J. Ouellet
2. R. Courtois
3. D. Fortin
4. S. Ferguson
5. P. C. Elkie
6. S. Hamel
7. M. Festa‐Bianchet
8. F. Pelletier

Citations in the corpus

• Red deer (Cervus elaphus) spatial use in the Italian Alps: home range patterns, seasonal migrations, and effects of snow and winter feeding (2006, background): “Ungulate use of space and home range size is the end result of a combination of phenotypic plasticity and natural selection that reflects successful strategies to maximise individual fitness (rettie & messier 2001, white & garrott 2005).”
• Seasonal movement patterns of woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus caribou) (2004, background): “The high degree of range fidelity found during spring and summer (also reported by Rettie & Messier, 2001 ) indicated that seasonal movements of woodland caribou are different from those of white-tailed deer (Lesage et al., 2000) and moose (Ball, Nordengren & Wallin, 2001).”
• Range fidelity: The missing link between caribou decline and habitat alteration? (2010, background): “ranges (Gullickson and Manseau, 2000; Schaefer et al., 2000; Rettie and Messier, 2001; Ferguson and Elkie, 2004; Wittmer et al., 2006; Metsaranta and Mallory, 2007).”
• Habitat Selection of a Large Herbivore at High Density and Without Predation: Trade-off between Forage and Cover? (2009, background): “—Individuals exposed to different limiting factors should select habitat differently (Rettie and Messier 2001) and, thus, the importance of the trade-off between forage and cover may vary (Mysterud and Østbye 1999).”
• Determining the fitness consequences of antipredation behavior (2005, background): “…1999; McLachlan et al., 2003; Roitberg et al., 2003; Witter et al., 1994) or simply avoid the predator spatially (Biro et al., 2004; Durant, 2000; Rettie and Messier, 2001) or temporally (Biro et al., 2004; Creel and Winnie, 2005; Watanuki, 1986) or allocate more time to antipredation behaviors…”