The X-ray to optical-UV luminosity ratio of X-ray selected type 1 AGN in XMM-COSMOS

By E. Lusso, A. Comastri, C. Vignali, G. Zamorani, M. Brusa, R. Gilli, K. Iwasawa, Mara Salvato, F. Civano, M. Elvis and 22 more. 2009

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We present a study of the X-ray to optical properties of a sample of 545 X-ray selected type 1 AGN, from the XMM-COSMOS survey, over a wide range of redshifts (0.04 \textless z \textless 4.25) and X-ray luminosities (40.6 \textless= Log L([2-10]) (keV) \textless= 45.3). About 60% of them are spectroscopically identified type 1 AGN, while the others have a reliable photometric redshift and are classified as type 1 AGN on the basis of their multi-band Spectral Energy Distributions. We discuss the relationship between UV and X-ray luminosity, as parameterized by the alpha(ox) spectral slope, and its dependence on redshift and luminosity. We compare our findings with previous investigations of optically selected broad-line AGN (mostly from SDSS). A highly significant correlation between alpha(ox) and L(2500) angstrom is found, in agreement with previous investigations of optically selected samples. We calculate bolometric corrections, k(bol), for the whole sample using hard X-ray luminosities (L([2-10] keV)), and the Eddington ratios for a subsample of 150 objects for which black hole mass estimates are available. We confirm the trend of increasing bolometric correction with increasing Eddington ratio as proposed in previous works. A tight correlation is found between alpha(ox) and k(bol), which can be used to estimate accurate bolometric corrections using only optical and X-ray data. We find a significant correlation between alpha(ox) and Eddington ratio, in which the ratio between X-ray and optical flux decreases with increasing Eddington ratio.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb7fe9d87a19705c776db03c10f58e6aa8b76f38

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. D. M. Alexander
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. L. Hernquist
  4. Volker Springel
  5. R. Dav'e
  6. R. Somerville
  7. W. N. Brandt
  8. Mara Salvato

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. D. M. Alexander
  4. A. Merloni
  5. W. N. Brandt
  6. Volker Springel
  7. R. Hickox
  8. Gordon Richards

Citations in the corpus