The Effectiveness of Problem Based Learning and Aptitude Treatment Interaction in Improving Mathematical Creative Thinking Skills on Curriculum 2013

By R. Maskur, Sumarno, Yasinta Rahmawati, K. Pradana, Muhamad Syazali, A. Septian, E. Palupi. European Journal of Educational Research, 2020

182 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The development of the revolution era 4.0 which increasingly rapidly demands the wider community to have the ability to think creatively mathematically. One effort to improve the ability to think creatively is through quality education. Quality education can be improved through to train thinking using the right learning model. This study aims to see which results are more effective in improving students' thinking skills between the two learning models applied. The two models are Problem Based Learning (PBL) and Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models. This research method uses quasi experimental method with a posttest only control test design not control group. This study uses two group subjects with two experimental classes. The analysis of the data used the hypothesis testing of the non-correlated 2-sample t-test. Based on the research results obtained Aptitude Treatment Interaction (ATI) models have a better effect on students' creative thinking abilities compared to Problem Based Learning (PBL) models.

Subfields: Applied Mathematics, Education

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb7675001b6c39e505efb8ebda88ec4b994c77cd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

  1. H. Pramusinto
  2. Muhsin
  3. Ahmad Nurkhin
  4. Kardoyo

Citations in the corpus