Using Ecological‐Niche Modeling to Predict Barred Owl Invasions with Implications for Spotted Owl Conservation

By A. Townsend Peterson, C. R. Robins. 2003

164 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb49fd4180cffeb3a08d74616163763c0d1deb41

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecological Modeling

In Ecology

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Environmental data sets matter in ecological niche modelling: an example with Solenopsis invicta and Solenopsis richteri. (2007, methodology): “Although comparative tests of ability to reconstruct the actual distributions of species have indicated relatively poor performance by GARP (Elith et al. , 2006), the method has seen extensive testing and exploration for the challenge of reconstructing species potential distributions, such as in app”
Predicting species distributions across the Amazonian and Andean regions using remote sensing data (2008, methodology): “The spatial accuracy of the predictions was tested following Phillips et al. (2006). For all eight species we created 10 random data partitions with 60% of the point localities assigned for training and 40% for testing, and ran the three scenarios with each of these 10 data partitions.”
Biodiversity informatics: managing and applying primary biodiversity data. (2004, background): “…(Sánchez-Cordero & Martínez Meyer 2000) or evaluation of possible routes for invasive species or diseases (Honig et al. 1992; Richardson & McMahon 1992; Scott & Panetta 1993; Higgins et al. 1999; Soberó n et al. 2001; Peterson & Robins 2003; Peterson et al. 2003) , to name just a few examples.”
A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling (2004, background): “…1992; Stockwell & Peters, 1999), because it has seen widespread recent use to study diverse topics such as global warming (Thomas et al., 2004), infectious diseases (Peterson & Shaw, 2003) and invasive species (Peterson & Robins, 2003); many further applications are cited in these references.”
Genetic Identification of Spotted Owls, Barred Owls, and Their Hybrids: Legal Implications of Hybrid Identity (2004, background): “Numerous hypotheses have been proposed to explain this radiation, ranging from forest expansion due to climate change in central Canada to forest management practices in the Pacific Northwest, but none have been definitively proven (Kelly et al. 2003; Peterson & Robins 2003).”
A comparative evaluation of presence‐only methods for modelling species distribution (2007, background): “Several studies have argued that limited dispersal may prevent species to occur in areas with suitable ecological conditions and should therefore reduce the accuracy of predictive maps produced by species distribution models (Pearson & Dawson, 2003; Peterson, 2003; Hampe, 2004).”
Uses and requirements of ecological niche models and related distributional models (2006, background): “…Higgins et al. 1999; Honig et al. 1992; Iguchi et al. 2004; Panetta and Dodd 1987; Papes and Peterson 2003; Peterson 2003a; Peterson et al. 2003a; Peterson and Robins 2003; Peterson et al. 2003b; Peterson and Vieglais 2001; Richardson and McMahon 1992; Scott and Panetta 1993; Skov 2000; Sutherst…”
The Invasion of Barred Owls and its Potential Effect on the Spotted Owl: a Conservation Conundrum (2007, background): “For example, Peterson and Robins (2003) developed a predictive model on the geographic spread of barred owls based purely on habitat characteristics, which predicted that barred owls will colonize the range of the northern spotted owl, but will not invade very far south into the range of the…”
Ecological niches and potential geographical distributions of Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata) and Natal fruit fly (Ceratitis rosa) (2007, background): “Several avenues of research have demonstrated accurate predictions of invasive species’ potential distributions (Peterson & Vieglais, 2001; Welk et al., 2002; Peterson, 2003; Peterson & Robins, 2003; Peterson et al., 2003a,b; Morrison et al., 2004; Thuiller et al., 2005).”
Conservatism of ecological niche characteristics in North American plant species over the Pleistocene‐to‐Recent transition (2006, unknown): “…Higgins et al., 1999; Sutherst et al., 1999; Skov, 2000; Hoffmann, 2001; Peterson & Vieglais, 2001; Papes & Peterson, 2003; Peterson et al., 2003a,b; Peterson & Robins, 2003; Iguchi et al., 2004) suggests that the different community contexts in two distinct distributional areas do not affect…”
Nonparametric Multiplicative Regression for Habitat Modeling (2011, methodology): “Rule-based methods (including GARP, Genetic Algorithm for Rule-set Prediction; Peterson 2001, Peterson et al. 2002, Peterson & Robins 2003; Scachetti-Pereira 2002) seek combinations of habitatbased rules to optimize prediction of species presence-absence.”