Carbon Footprint

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Good Intents, but Low Impacts: Diverging Importance of Motivational and Socioeconomic Determinants Explaining Pro-Environmental Behavior, Energy Use, and Carbon Footprint (2018, background): “…a variety of footprint calculators exist that have proven successful as tools for public communication and awareness building, several of them display inconsistencies and insufficient transparency regarding underlying methods and estimates (Čuček, Klemeš, & Kravanja, 2012; Weidema et al., 2008).”
Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation (2011, background): “As more and more organizations start reporting complete LCA, a database can be developed through which average firm specific data can be estimated to suite the purpose (Matthews et al. 2008b; Weidema et al. 2008).”
Rigorous classification and carbon accounting principles for low and Zero Carbon Cities (2011, background): “Weidema et al. (2008) discuss the usefulness of a carbon footprint indicator, which measures only one type of emission (e.g., CO 2 or GHGs), as compared to a more comprehensive lifecycle assessment approach, which attempts to measure and assess impacts across a wide array of categories.”