Prices and Poverty in India, 1987-2000
By Angus Deaton. 2003
124 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb4433892118172046bfb2ce10c8c8bf8e5ff0e4
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Ira N. Gang
- Abhijit Banerjee
- Thomas Piketty
- K. Sen
- Angus Deaton
- V. Kozel
- Urvashi Narain
- Myeong-Su Yun
Citations in the corpus
- Top Indian Incomes, 1922-2000 (2005, background): “For a broader, international perspective on the survey and national accounts debate, see Deaton (2003c).”
- Push or Pull? Drivers of Female Labor Force Participation During India's Economic Boom (2012, background): “8 Earnings are spatially deflated and in 1987-88 Rupees, based on the Labour Bureau Consumer Price Index for Industrial Workers and Deaton (2003). No adjustment is made for hours worked.”
- Poverty and resource dependence in rural India (2008, background): “To put these figures in perspective (as well as for later reference in the concluding section), the poverty line for Madhya Pradesh in 1999–2000, as estimated by Deaton (2003), was just Rs. 3467.”
- Poverty Decline, Agricultural Wages, and Non-Farm Employment in Rural India 1983–2004 (2009, unknown): “The problem is well described in several of the papers included in the special issue (Deaton, 2003a, Datt, Kozel and Ravallion, 2003, Sundaram and Tendulkar, 2003).”
- Poverty In Rural India: Caste And Tribe (2008, background): “However, rural poverty remains persistent, with the headcount ratio being 30.2 percent in 1999/2000 (Deaton, 2003a).”
- Data and Dogma : The Great Indian Poverty Debate (2005, background): “The details of this work were originally laid out in Deaton and Tarozzi (2000) and were brought up to date in the brief note by Deaton (2003), who presents a set of poverty lines based on the indexes.”