Effect of woody borders on insect density and diversity in crop fields: A landscape-scale analysis

By J. D. Holland, L. Fahrig. 2000

178 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb26513fcb89cdcfca2df477a168cba129fd55b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Genetics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

Determining the Spatial Scale of Species' Response to Habitat (2004, background): “…alfalfa insect richness (Jonsen and Fahrig 1997), amount of forest on raccoon density (Pedlar et al. 1997),amount of wooded border on alfalfa insect richness and density (Holland and Fahrig 2000), and amount of summer habitat and breeding pond density on leopard frog abundance (Pope et al. 2000).”
Vegetation increases the abundance of natural enemies in vineyards (2009, background): “Pest damage can even be higher at the edge of fields bordered by trees despite an increase in natural enemies (Holland and Fahrig, 2000).”
Sustainable pest regulation in agricultural landscapes: a review on landscape composition, biodiversity and natural pest control (2006, background): “Klug et al. (2003) found no effect of forests on the density of Autographa gamma (L.) larvae, and Holland & Fahrig (2000) reported that densities of weevils infesting alfalfa fields were not affected by the presence of woody field borders.”
Distribution and activity of Drosophila suzukii in cultivated raspberry and surrounding vegetation (2016, background): “However, field margins may play an important ecological role by providing food and habitat for pollinators and natural enemies (Holland and Fahrig 2000; Marshall and Moonen 2002).”
Factors and mechanisms explaining spatial heterogeneity: a review of methods for insect populations (2011, background): “Investigating the connectivity between landscape elements and populations is simple when those elements are represented by lines (Holland & Fahrig 2000).”
Rethinking patch size and isolation effects: the habitat amount hypothesis (2013, background): “Several studies have shown such positive effects of the amount of habitat in the local landscape on species richness within sample sites (Holland & Fahrig, 2000; Fischer et al., 2005; Hendrickx et al., 2009; Bailey et al., 2010; Garden et al., 2010; Smith et al., 2011; Flick et al., 2012; Rodr…”
Efficacy and economics of shelter habitats for conservation biological control (2008, background): “At larger scales, landscape heterogeneity has been shown to contribute to greater invertebrate diversity and to the increased effectiveness of natural enemies (Colunga-Garcia et al., 1997; Bommarco, 1998b; Holland and Fahrig, 2000; Bianchi et al., 2006; Marino et al., 2006).”
Landscape context and carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) communities of hedgerows in western France (2003, background): “Holland and Fahrig (2000) studied the density and richness of herbivorous insects in alfalfa fields in relation to nature and density of field margin, and found a significant positive effect of the amount of woody borders in the landscape on the insect family richness in the fields.”
Pest damage and arthropod community structure in organic vs. conventional tomato production in California (2001, result): “Our finding of overlap in damage and herbivore levels but higher biodiversity on organic tomato compared with conventional tomato is similar to a comparison of Holland & Fahrig (2000) who also found habitat factors (in this case woody borders within a 1-km radius) influencing the diversity of herb”
Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. (2011, background): “Second, the many studies that have been conducted at the landscape scale, i.e. comparing biodiversity across multiple agricultural landscapes (e.g. Jonsen & Fahrig 1997; Holland & Fahrig 2000; Thies et al. 2003; Holzschuh et al. 2010), generally do not address landscape heterogeneity directly.”