Lower protein in infant formula is associated with lower weight up to age 2 y: a randomized clinical trial.

By Berthold Koletzko, R. von Kries, R. Closa, J. Escribano, S. Scaglioni, M. Giovannini, Jeannette Beyer, H. Demmelmair, D. Gruszfeld, A. Dobrzańska and 4 more. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2009

680 citations recorded by the source corpus.

BACKGROUND Protein intake during infancy was associated with rapid early weight gain and later obesity in observational studies. OBJECTIVE The objective was to test the hypothesis that higher protein intake in infancy leads to more rapid length and weight gain in the first 2 y of life. DESIGN In a multicenter European study, 1138 healthy, formula-fed infants were randomly assigned to receive cow milk-based infant and follow-on formula with lower (1.77 and 2.2 g protein/100 kcal, respectively) or higher (2.9 and 4.4 g protein/100 kcal, respectively) protein contents for the first year. For comparison, 619 exclusively breastfed children were also followed. Weight, length, weight-for-length, and BMI were determined at inclusion and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo of age. The primary endpoints were length and weight at 24 mo of age, expressed as length and weight-for-length z scores based on the 2006 World Health Organization growth standards. RESULTS Six hundred thirty-six children in the lower (n = 313) and higher (n = 323) protein formula groups and 298 children in the breastfed group were followed until 24 mo. Length was not different between randomized groups at any time. At 24 mo, the weight-for-length z score of infants in the lower protein formula group was 0.20 (0.06, 0.34) lower than that of the higher protein group and did not differ from that of the breastfed reference group. CONCLUSIONS A higher protein content of infant formula is associated with higher weight in the first 2 y of life but has no effect on length. Lower protein intake in infancy might diminish the later risk of overweight and obesity. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00338689.

Subfields: Epidemiology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/cb216e96f7a0f82b332f68a16253fd9be9b38c4b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Nutrition and Dietetics

  1. Efsa Panel on Dietetic Products

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. Efsa Panel on Dietetic Products

Citations in the corpus